Ain't It Cool News: The best in movie, TV, DVD, and comic book news.

Disney Names Replacements For Roger Ebert & Richard Roeper!!

First! by Nico Toscani	Jul 22nd, 2008 07:55:08 PM
I finally, really, did it!
Dammit SoylentMean! by Nico Toscani	Jul 22nd, 2008 07:55:49 PM
I didn't finally, really do it!
Ugh by aversiontherapy2	Jul 22nd, 2008 07:56:58 PM
Why would they turn a decent review show into another Hollywood gossip-fest?
Jeffrey lyons and neal gabler by Scuzzy	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:01:45 PM
Now that brings back some utterly awful memories. I remember being destroyed when Gene and Roger left the PBS show. I felt betrayed. That was a 10 year old kid's only reason to turn on PBS once a week.
It's Ben MANKIEWICZ by MistaSparkle88	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:02:26 PM
I don't want to be that anal Talkbacker, but I just couldn't let this one slide. And will he still keep his gig at TCM? I really enjoy watching him on the weekends.
blows by reckni	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:05:16 PM
Pretty much stopped watching when Ebert went down. I like Roeper though, and his columns are pretty entertaining.
I wonder how anyone is going to realize... by eggart	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:05:38 PM
it's even supposed to be the same show. Ebert's name is basically the brand they were coasting on.
Nothing beats Siskel & Ebert though by mistergreen	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:07:17 PM
We will never see the likes of them ever again.
I actually like Ben Mankiewicz.......and...... by LHombreSiniestro	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:11:30 PM
I think Ben Lyons is a tool.....seriously, something about him, I hate that pretty boy....
So, for the past few years by Big Jim	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:14:43 PM
we've had "At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper" without Ebert. Now with 2 hosts, neither of whom are either Ebert or Roeper, will they change the name of the show? The show went into the land of the ordinary when Disney refused to put out for the "thumbs up" trademark. But it fell even more, into the land of the lame, when they started using "See It, Skip It, Rent It" as their recommendations. I preferred, if no thumbs, just their opinions and did not see the need to add another simplistic ratings system for morons who can't understand anything more than 2 syllables long. I predict the new "At the Movies with Who? & the Other Guy" to be about as popular as the Siskel & Ebert lacking "Sneak Previews". That is to say, not at all.
Scuzzy: by Mostholy	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:15:13 PM
"That was a 10 year old kid's only reason to turn on PBS once a week." Don't forget Doctor Who, which was on late Saturday nights...if I fell asleep in the middle, I always awoke to Jack Horkheimer, Star Hustler. At any rate, these guys sound like scrubs. I'll stick to Metacritic, thanks.
Fuck These Guys by Vic_Arpeggio	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:15:27 PM
The only thing worse than Jeffrey Lyons was Michael Medved (despite liking the Golden Turkey Awards). I predict this show biting the dust about a month after it premieres.
Oh, I didn't realize Roeper was going too by CherryValance	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:15:43 PM
Oh snap. Anyway, If I'm right about who Lyons is, then he's worse than Roeper. Roeper's a pinhead but at least he knows movies. Whenever I've seen Lyons on nomination announcements (the only time I watch E! anymore), he doesn't seem to have any idea what he's talking about. Ben Mankiewicz is pretty cool though. That should be interesting.
You can't replace Roger Ebert + Gene Siskel by DARTH VOODOO	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:16:04 PM
Richard Roeper also did a great job.
Never heard of these guys by Mullah Omar	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:17:03 PM
And after today, probably never will again.
Ebert and Roeper are going to continue the show by DARTH VOODOO	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:17:08 PM
They didn't like the new format and there was some type of contract dispute.
Seems sort of strange for them to announce their replacements so by eggart	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:22:04 PM
Disney's been a scheming son of a bitch, it seems.
- quickly. by eggart	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:23:48 PM
Limiting the number of characters you can type into the subject box would help avoid these cut-offs.
Neal Gabler by Tar Heel	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:32:30 PM
Wasn't Neal Gabler one of the replacement hosts with Jeffrey Lyons at one time? As for Michael Medved, anyone who guests-hosts Rush Limbaugh's show has a big strike against them in my book.
Where's Roeper's statement? by Riley Martin	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:32:42 PM
Did he agree to all this too? lol
Booooooooooooooooooooooooo! by Bungion Boy	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:35:47 PM
This is going to be just awful. I hate Jeffrey Lyons so I assume I hate his son as well. I'm not too fond of Mr. Morning on TCM as well. Get your new show soon, Roeper. And bring it to New York and team up with AO Scott.
woah by Charlie Murphy	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:35:58 PM
that's effed up, i thought ebert was just recovering from his surgery then he'd be back... not that i ever watched ebert & roeper, but i always kind of assumed they'd be there forever.
Recast the roles with younger actors... by Prof. Pop-Cult	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:38:40 PM
Just reboot the franchise and this time turn Gene Siskel into a young, hip white female named "Jean Siskel" and cast a heavy-set black dude for the part of "Rog" Ebert.
Ben & Ben? by Orionsangels	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:45:52 PM
"Stand down you little midget!"
shoulda signed the 2 geezers by bacci40	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:48:52 PM
disney doesnt get it...nobody wants or needs to watch msm level critics on tv...but they will watch to old fucks with over 100 years of cinema experience between them do battle weekly
3 weeks?! What about reviews of DEATH RACE, THE ROCKER, HOUSE BU by TallBoy66	Jul 22nd, 2008 08:49:41 PM
DISASTER MOVIE, BABYLON A.D., COLLEGE, BANGKOCK DANGEROUS... and various other end of August/ Early September dumping ground movies. Yes, they'll all suck, but that' prime movie reviewage bitching. Eh, probably a good idea to bail those weeks... (to be fair, IMDB says The Rocker was moved forwards 2 weeks, so now the superhot chick from Superbad, Emma Stone, has TWO movies out the same week Rocker and House Bunny. Still seeing The Rocker for her but, good lord, she's hot.)
Now he can suck just like his dad! by The Funketeer	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:17:24 PM
Cuz that's what happened to Sneak Previews when Siskel and Ebert left.
Disney really fucked themselves, and these hosts on this by smackfu	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:26:34 PM
For one thing, there was no need to ever announce this as 'replacing' Ebert and Roeper, because a) it was only a matter of time before the show ended on a graceful bow-out due to Ebert's illness and the fact that it's not even Ebert and Roeper anymore, the show is essentially just a placeholder while they hope Ebert gets good enough to come back, which we sadly all know isn't going to happen. and b) this new show isn't going to be anything like Ebert and Roeper. One show is shutting down, and another one is starting up. This happens a dozen times per tv season, it's not remarkable. There was no point in associating the new show as a 'replacement' for a beloved show that's leaving and immediately generating negative press about it, Disney's PR person is incompetent. If Disney had just cancelled Ebert & Roeper for the obvious reasons (the show is just going through the motions at this point) and then just a month later started their new E news show, would any of you have made any connection between the two at all?
You can't replace Roger Ebert by snowpuff	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:33:17 PM
I think you meant they will SUCCEED Roger Ebert. No one can or will replace him.
What? Were Billy Bush & Ryan Seacrest booked? by Jugdish	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:42:04 PM
What a fucking Joke
whatever... by dingus khan	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:46:15 PM
...the best part of that show died with siskel. roeper is an idiot.
M-O-O-N. That spells two thumbs down. by Tom Cullen	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:46:40 PM
What a retarded decision this is on Disney's part, and believe me, I know retarded. M-O-O-N. That spells Fuck Disney!
Billy Bush by KazamaSmokers	Jul 22nd, 2008 09:50:55 PM
"Good MORNING Meridith!! This is fanTAStic! It's BeYOOtiful!!!"
Lyons and Mankiewicz? by Holeman	Jul 22nd, 2008 10:04:39 PM
Just doesn't have the same ring. At all.
The End of an ERA by FuryofthefilmFan	Jul 22nd, 2008 10:09:21 PM
good thing we can still rely on internet reviews.
Roeper is a douchebag by nascentia	Jul 22nd, 2008 10:17:32 PM
But I generally agree with Ebert, his reviews are usually spot-on, IMO. His only glaring flaw is he doesn't appreciate horror movies at all, it seems. He doesn't know how to review them.
At the Movies with The Bens by Playhouse	Jul 22nd, 2008 10:46:16 PM
(All due respect to Mssrs. Folds, Lee and Kweller.) Sounds like something you get if you go to the bad movies.
Much Rather See... by Playhouse	Jul 22nd, 2008 10:47:43 PM

Much Rather See... by Playhouse	Jul 22nd, 2008 10:49:02 PM
At the Movies with Waldorf and Statler... "It's like a kind of torture to have to watch... Terminator Salvation..."
M-O-O-N. That spells quadfather09 by Tom Cullen	Jul 22nd, 2008 11:13:40 PM
Couldn't agree more buddy. On both points. M-O-O-N. That spells copasetic.
joeelliott...pussy juice equals ratings by bacci40	Jul 22nd, 2008 11:22:09 PM
i could see it now...forget thumbs up....how does it rate on the chocalate pussy juice meter....booya
I bet the new Ebert show... by DocBosch	Jul 22nd, 2008 11:23:04 PM
...will be called something like "Roger Ebert Presents 'In The Balconey'" or "Roger Ebert's 'Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down'" then "with Richard Roeper and Whoever Thefuckelse". That way, his names on the show without him actually having to be. Though, it's be nice if they could somehow READ one of his reviews for that week's big or important film, or some editorial by him.
This really is a non-story by Cotton McKnight	Jul 22nd, 2008 11:27:47 PM
Ebert left, Roeper left, they have the thumbs up/down for them to use however they want. This is just a different show that nobody will watch. Ebert and Roeper will be back in some incarnation, just like Siskel and Ebert were when they left PBS. And I know I am being one of those "anal" talkbackers but I would like to point out that I was the first one to bring up that comparison when this story was first reported here. I really do wish that Harry would have clarified that Roeper was leaving as well. This has led to mass confusion. It's simply a different show. It has nothing to do with Ebert or Roeper. They aren't GOING away. They will just have a new show somewhere else.
Don't Know the Audience by Conrad Rooks	Jul 22nd, 2008 11:50:44 PM
What the execs fail to realize is that the only young people who watch movie review shows are nerds. I should know as I am one. I remember those long ago days in the mid-nineties when, as a teenager, my classmates were planning for the homecoming dance while I was excited about Siskel and Ebert's review for Sling Blade. It was a lonely childhood sometimes.... That being said, most young people give two shits about folks droning on about film. Hiring this Ben Lyons joker only give suspicion to the possibility of creating another glittery PR station studios will hit up in order to pimp their films. By next summer, this show won't exist. Also, if memory serves me right, Ben Lyons called I Am Legend one of the best films ever made. Discuss.
As someone who grew up watching Roger & Gene by INWOsuxRED	Jul 23rd, 2008 12:21:34 AM
on WTTW Channel 11 in Chicago, then WGN, then syndication, I have no interest in watching this show Disney plans to air. Another asshole from the Lyons family out to ruin a good Roger Ebert show.
We really are in trouble in current times. Nepostism. by GQtaste	Jul 23rd, 2008 12:27:42 AM
I don't know the other dude, but i've seen the rich kid on E channel. I know both of them come from famous fathers. Gotta love Nepotism.
They should have gotten somebody from this site. by GQtaste	Jul 23rd, 2008 12:44:43 AM
the lyon kid is nothing but an yuppy that grew up w/ his dad in the business doing the same thing. And of course he's on the e channel which caters to 11 yr old girls. And he's perfect at that job.
BEN LYONS???????? by Paul T. Ryan	Jul 23rd, 2008 01:03:51 AM
Quote-whore extraordinare!!! The new, younger, even more slobbering Pete Hammond. Pass!
Really? An E-blogger?.... by jimmy_009	Jul 23rd, 2008 01:07:59 AM
...yeah this show will be gone in a minute.
Any critic worth reading is one who saw Star Wars and Jaws by Cotton McKnight	Jul 23rd, 2008 01:30:29 AM
During their first run. If you aren't old enough to have done that, then go to hell.
I just went to Lyon's IMDB page. Someone wrote "HOTTIE!" by Cotton McKnight	Jul 23rd, 2008 01:34:42 AM
Really, what else needs to be said? What a joke this is.
fuck the new show format by Prossor	Jul 23rd, 2008 02:28:10 AM
changing it from two guys simply chatting about movies to overcomplicating it by making it into an entertainment tonight style glitzfuckfest.
yawn by palewook	Jul 23rd, 2008 05:41:50 AM
thumbs down on the new disney show. would sooner watch Roger Ebert & Richard Roeper wherever they might land
Let's get rid of all the old people on TV!!!! by kwisatzhaderach	Jul 23rd, 2008 06:50:53 AM
Because, you know, there's nothing to be learned from then right??? Let's bring in some young assholes and fill the airwaves with more crap!
Figured it'd be Morirary and Harry by cowboyone	Jul 23rd, 2008 07:35:40 AM
Who the F are these nerds?
At least its not Mike Medved by Knobules	Jul 23rd, 2008 08:42:06 AM
That guy wheres glasses with no lenses to look smart. Really, if you see him and he is wearing those smartyframes. Poke him in the eye. Poke! Hey theres no lens in there.
At The Junior High by ArcadianDS	Jul 23rd, 2008 09:23:11 AM
with Knowles and McWeeney. "So I give this one two dogfarts. Drew?" "My kid reviewed his new Veggie Tales DVD this morning by crapping in his diaper." "Isn't he 12 now?" "well thats all the time we have. Tune in next week when we review my latest surgery pictures, my arrested adolescence, and whatever DVD McWeeney Jr pooped on. Also my surprise pick of the week: my numb ass."
If they wanted to go with two Bens by Cory849	Jul 23rd, 2008 09:32:50 AM
They should have just hired Brian Benben. Woulda been cheaper AND funnier.
Gene Shalitt needs a reality show by fiester	Jul 23rd, 2008 09:40:50 AM
Just saying.
Just CGI Siskel And Ebert by Tipsy McStagger	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:16:40 AM
You ALL know you want it.
Fuck this new show by santi01	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:27:52 AM
Viva Ebert & Roeper! R.I.P Gene
CGI'd Ebert & Siskel by santi01	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:28:48 AM
funny shit Tipsy
They should have stuck to guest reviewers when Gene died. by Photoman	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:52:29 AM
Roeper just didn't have the credentials to be a reviewer. He's a columnist for the Sun-Times, not a movie reviewer. And quite frankly, the show died with Gene as it would have died if Roger was the first to go. The show was all about Gene's and Roger's point and counter-point to each other. They were rivals and competing newspapers and they were equals in every sense of the word. They challenged each other and didn't let the other one get away with any bullshit. The show was simple, straight forward and got into the discussion of movies without any flash and glamor. I cringe to see what Disney is going to do to the show now...probably make it into quick 3-second jump cuts with wild camera angles and "shaky-cam". Probably with the hosts standing against a green-screen with cool graphics behind them...cause that's what the kids want today! Oh well, all good things must pass...
Give Leah Rozen by dirtsandwich	Jul 23rd, 2008 11:15:45 AM
her own show. At least the reviews will be right.
Gene Shalit's pubic hair transplants by Bobo_Vision	Jul 23rd, 2008 11:21:04 AM
Coming soon to late night infomercials, Gene Shalit will be selling his copyrighted procedure whereby he had pubic hair from his armpits and groin transplanted onto his head - coming soon to a hair loss clinic near you!
Cancer Strikes The Two Greatest Reviews Ever... by Tipsy McStagger	Jul 23rd, 2008 11:29:25 AM
Yet Shalit, Lyons and Medved walk the Earth unscathed. What gives?
One thing that no one's mentioned... by EriamJH	Jul 23rd, 2008 11:47:17 AM
... removing the "critical" part of a "critic's review show" means that Disney will never get a bad review. Just like a good press release, or the Disney-owned ABC network, when Good Morning America broadcasts from the amusement parks a couple times a year. Do you think ABC news will ever do a spot on unfair Disney work practices? Do you think controlling the media distribution on an entertainment show will give a "thumbs down" on a Disney film (when the McDonald's Happy Meal movie tie-in was already in place 2 years ago)? That said, I expect a lot more coverage on Hannah Montana and High School Musical -- we Americans can't get enough of that stuff shoved down our throats!
"Is reviewing some kind of hereditary ability?" by Big Jim	Jul 23rd, 2008 12:51:49 PM
No, but being an ass-hat is. I hate Entertainment Tonight. Once, way back in the early days, before the multitude of copycats and the internet, it was a great place to see early footage of upcoming films. I still have the video tape of their "first look" at Jurassic Park. Greatest segment ever. Now it's just a bunch of "pretty" people yelling about crap no one cares about (but people think they should care because it's on tv and the host is so excited about what they are saying they are yelling). Heath Ledger's death proved to the world how irrelevant ET has become. Because they record the show, the news of Ledger's death was over 24 hours old before ET ever said word-one about it. Local news stations had the story a day before "the premiere entertainment show on television". What was ET's big story that day? An exclusive interview (it ran in several parts during the week) with the paparazzi dude who was banging Britney Spears. That's not news! That's pandering to the lowest common denominator! It's creating "celebrities" out of a parasite whose only accomplishment was nailing a mentally unbalanced famous chick during one of the lowest points in her life. Way to go ET for making this bottom feeding piece of shit, and where he sticks his dick, into a "big deal". More recently, as we all know, Stan Winston died. I'm sure 99% of ET viewers today would say "who?", but so what? The man was a legend in the industry and ET should at least make an attempt at being about celebrating all things Hollywood. I watched all week and never saw a single mention. Maybe I blinked and missed it. I saw everything from "news" about fallout from Miley Cyrus' photo shoot, to "which celebrity has the best bikini bod". But not a single second devoted to the man who is responsible for some of the most iconic images in film in the past 25 years. Fuck. ET proved then and there that not only are they not relevant for entertainment news but are so completely out of touch with the industry that they supposedly cover. What a worthless program it has become.
I Feel the IQ Points Draining by Stacy Without An E	Jul 23rd, 2008 12:57:21 PM
Hello, we're the Disney corporation. Since we've had such success dumbing down the American public with shows like "Hannah Montana" and "High School Musical" we would now like to continue. Effective immediately, we're replacing two intelligent and well written movie reviewers with a text messenger and a pretty boy. Our job here is done.
Why they worked by veritasses	Jul 23rd, 2008 01:49:32 PM
Gene being bald and Ebert being fat, the duo were the exact opposite of the disgustingly fake “pretty boy/girl”, E-list, not-quite-a-celebrity-but-want s-to-be-a-celebrity “personalities“ we get now. They weren’t second or third generation insiders who rode on anyone’s coat tails. They were your average Joes that you might talk to at the office water cooler. They were film nerds who had a deep passion for movies and were first and foremost students and historians and lecturers and commentators of film. As such they weren’t obsessed with meeting celebrities or looking good on TV or trying to get in with the in-crowd. They weren’t worried about offending celebrities or studios with bad reviews and they didn’t have other voices/forces affect their reviews (eg: this movie is too violent and I don’t want kids to see violent films and my religion tells me to avoid violence so that’s why I don’t like this film). They were very smart and were excellent writers but they didn’t go out of their way to use big words or industry lingo or resort to pulling an obscure film out of their hat to make them look smart. They were driven only by film and they were genuine. They had real personalities and yet were somehow not annoying (or perhaps were not annoying because they had real personalities). And perhaps most importantly, they had heart and it was evident in their pure love of film as well as how they interacted with each other…. Well, maybe not in the beginning when they hated each other. But that too was genuine and wasn’t restrained by the “let’s all place nice” bull. Roeper’s not bad but he doesn’t have his equal and opposite sitting across the aisle. He’s also missing “heart.” And he’ll never quite be as fun to watch as Siskel or Ebert but he’s by far the best of the current batch of TV critics.
Since it's Disney owned I thought by skimn	Jul 23rd, 2008 01:57:20 PM
they would have two 3-d animated cows voiced by Dave Thomas and Rick Moranis and call it "At The Moo-vies"
I remember when I was a kid by Abominable Snowcone	Jul 23rd, 2008 02:50:00 PM
I'd watch "Sneak Previews" just to get a glimpse of movies I was looking forward to. Now, it's easy to see images throughout production, and trailers / teasers hit the net months outside of release
I'm gonna have to watch these guys at 3am by Rupee88	Jul 23rd, 2008 04:12:54 PM
yeah, no one really cares
The best US movie series I ever saw was the one by emeraldboy	Jul 23rd, 2008 04:14:00 PM
Where they showed you the different parts of the process of filmmaking Special effects. I think it was called cinemagic. Best show about films ever. Really insightful, interesting. scene from a film would be stripped down and at the end of the show they would show you the finished scene.
None of you have to watch Jonathan Ross.. by emeraldboy	Jul 23rd, 2008 04:19:44 PM
Kiss the ass of the stars on his shows. appalling. He doesnt care about reviewing films anymore. The BBC should have killed off Film show when barry norman retired. I completely agree with Gloria Hunniford and her views on Jonathan Ross interviewing style. He seems overly interested in his libido for some reason.
So every movie will get a thumbs up? by spectrebeeyatch	Jul 23rd, 2008 06:08:02 PM
Getting these two ass holes for the show just seems like ABC will use this slot to pimp movies. Fuck this. AICN keep us updated on what Roeper is doing so we can all watch what he does instead of this shit!
lets burn disney to the ground by duncanwk	Jul 23rd, 2008 08:05:45 PM
I mean it. I got a can a gasoline and some matches!
Michael Phillips by The Alienist	Jul 23rd, 2008 08:33:30 PM
I've gotta say I've been enjoying Phillips on the show. He and Roeper are from rival newspapers, just as Siskel and Ebert were. And Phillips is very knowledgeable and pithy about films. I wish they'd just renamed it Roeper & Phillips and kept it up...which is what I always expected....
Fannie Mae & Freddie Macs Funtime Films & Finances by G100	Jul 23rd, 2008 08:44:39 PM
Get those two. They've been all over the News lately.
Blogger does not = journalist by Dr Gregory House	Jul 23rd, 2008 08:53:07 PM
I have a blog and I'm a total douche! Why are bloggers getting so much pub and rep these days?!?
Mankiewicz kicks ass; Roeper sucks ass. by thegreatwhatzit	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:15:13 PM
Mankiewicz is glib and affably dry (some cool one-liners; "PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPAPCE makes ABBOTT AND COSTELLO IN THE FOREIGN LEGION comparatively look like ON THE WATERFRONT."). Roeper is a pretentious prick; bereft of Ebert's personality, he has no tolerance for anyone who challenges his disposable opinion. The jury is out on Lyons; if he's like his dad, he'll love everything (he'd gauge BELA LUGOSI MEETS A BROOKLYN GORILLA as the U.S. equivalent of the Ealing comedies).
Memories of Siskel & Ebert on by thegreatwhatzit	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:29:21 PM
THE TONIGHT SHOW. Ebert: "What the hell is wrong with you? I loved FREE WILLY!" Siskel: "No wonder, you can relate to the title character." They really seemed to loathe one another. It was great chemistry.
Send in the Clowns... by crankyoldguy	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:48:59 PM
Never mind, they're almost already here.
Ben's Dad Jeff by SnootyBoots	Jul 23rd, 2008 10:49:10 PM
has a current 2 Critics Debate Movies show with an attractive British woman named, I believe, Allison Beales that sometimes shows up on Sunday afternoons here in Chicago when the NBC affiliate isn't showing sports. The last time I saw it they distinguished themselves by being the only 2 human beings to like THE LOVE GURU. They have a segment on that show where they interview a movie actor. Interesting that Mike Meyers was the guest on that episode.
Boycott! by Filmaholic	Jul 24th, 2008 11:15:25 PM
Enough said!
Screw these guys by jtp8000	Jul 25th, 2008 09:31:17 AM
Get Damon Wayans and David Allen Grier.
End of an era? by LeftFoot	Aug 26th, 2008 07:38:45 PM
I thought the show was never as good after Siskel left. The show of the two guys that started it ends without a bang or a whimper, just the machinations of corporate greed.
Third time by INWOsuxRED	Aug 26th, 2008 09:16:33 PM
Ebert's show has been taken over by a couple o turds.

Talkbacks

Disney Names Replacements For Roger Ebert & Richard Roeper!!

User login

Quick Talkback

Talkbacks